On the persecution of linguistic minority has been around for thousands of years, and while hundreds of discussions have taken place in terms of solutions, the international community have yet to reach a conclusion. While Sochum realizes that the issue “it[racial prejudice] can only fade, you can't get rid of it completely.”, many different sides of the argument are presented as delegates struggle to solve the crisis.
Language
Delegates and Countries have come to a disagreement with whether or not linguistic language should be integrated permanently into the education system. While some argue that the language of linguistic minors should be taught as a permanent part of the education system, as having “one national language will corrode the country’s nationality over the years”, others argue it is a “ a waste of time implementation of languages that people don’t want to learn.” Some claim that “Some of the most successful states in the world are multilingual.”, while others argue that “Within a country, there are many different ethnic groups, and it does not make any sense to enforce languages on all areas of a country”. The committee is highly divided, with some pushing for recognition of only one national language, while others
Cultural centres may save the day
One possible solution is offering cultural centres, funded by the government if minority individuals make request to the government. The goal is to provide“ a place where they can preserve their culture.” There are no current set plan in place for the funding of these centres by third war countries.
Technology
In the event of the social biases, global superpowers, like the United states of America “is willing to advocate inclusiveness through education.” through their powerful and influential social media program. However, none of the countries touch on the already existing social bigotry caused by social media platforms. In addition, many third world countries where these discriminations are taking place have no access to the technologies first war countries are using.
Problems within
. Meanwhile, on the topic of prejudice, only certain delegates are fully integrated in the discussions, while others are being left out at the very topic of bigotry . Many delegates are confused on bloc positions, and feel that their voices are not being represented fully in the resolution papers.
“ We feel that they [the bigger blocs] are only focusing on certain aspects, especially those with a focus on money. They are not focusing on the people themselves.”
Language
Delegates and Countries have come to a disagreement with whether or not linguistic language should be integrated permanently into the education system. While some argue that the language of linguistic minors should be taught as a permanent part of the education system, as having “one national language will corrode the country’s nationality over the years”, others argue it is a “ a waste of time implementation of languages that people don’t want to learn.” Some claim that “Some of the most successful states in the world are multilingual.”, while others argue that “Within a country, there are many different ethnic groups, and it does not make any sense to enforce languages on all areas of a country”. The committee is highly divided, with some pushing for recognition of only one national language, while others
Cultural centres may save the day
One possible solution is offering cultural centres, funded by the government if minority individuals make request to the government. The goal is to provide“ a place where they can preserve their culture.” There are no current set plan in place for the funding of these centres by third war countries.
Technology
In the event of the social biases, global superpowers, like the United states of America “is willing to advocate inclusiveness through education.” through their powerful and influential social media program. However, none of the countries touch on the already existing social bigotry caused by social media platforms. In addition, many third world countries where these discriminations are taking place have no access to the technologies first war countries are using.
Problems within
. Meanwhile, on the topic of prejudice, only certain delegates are fully integrated in the discussions, while others are being left out at the very topic of bigotry . Many delegates are confused on bloc positions, and feel that their voices are not being represented fully in the resolution papers.
“ We feel that they [the bigger blocs] are only focusing on certain aspects, especially those with a focus on money. They are not focusing on the people themselves.”