IN THE HUNGER GAMES - 8:30 pm
The United Nations Security Council as a dinner party is unparalleled in scope – their conversation topics are later discussed about all over the world, and their choices in entrées can devastate a nation. This session, after much discussion, the countries finally decided to go to the Arctic for their fuel consumption. The greed exhibited was unparalleled, with national appetites increasing at alarming rates, voracious eyes aimed towards the gavel at the front of the room. Russia logically pointed out that only those physically bordering the buffet table will and should eat. How the fuel will be divided, given its liquid form, is still to be determined.
CHILLY - 9:30 pm
The United Nations Security Council’s Chile proposed the creation of more councils, insisting
that the problem with the issue of Arctic territory division and governance stemmed from a lack of unity.
When interviewed, political analyst Robert Fjord scoffed at the suggestion. “The likelihood of increased
compliance or unity with the creation of more [busy] bodies is preposterous. Allowing more people to
argue over this issue will simply drag it out.” He added that Chile must have ulterior motives, to propose
such a time-wasting plan for such a pressing problem – even Canada is tense over the topic of the Arctic.
ON AN ICE FLOE - 10:30 pm
In regards to the land disputed in the United Nations Security Council, the obvious
solution has been touched upon by Australia, whose subtlety was missed by the posturing of the other
countries. Australia suggested that the much sought-after Arctic be labelled as an environmental
sanctuary. This solution is the most cost-efficient thus far, as it essentially allows the land dispute to
melt away – quite literally. With global warming on the rise, the disputed land mass will simply melt into
the ocean, thus leaving the UNSC with one less topic to discuss.
The United Nations Security Council as a dinner party is unparalleled in scope – their conversation topics are later discussed about all over the world, and their choices in entrées can devastate a nation. This session, after much discussion, the countries finally decided to go to the Arctic for their fuel consumption. The greed exhibited was unparalleled, with national appetites increasing at alarming rates, voracious eyes aimed towards the gavel at the front of the room. Russia logically pointed out that only those physically bordering the buffet table will and should eat. How the fuel will be divided, given its liquid form, is still to be determined.
CHILLY - 9:30 pm
The United Nations Security Council’s Chile proposed the creation of more councils, insisting
that the problem with the issue of Arctic territory division and governance stemmed from a lack of unity.
When interviewed, political analyst Robert Fjord scoffed at the suggestion. “The likelihood of increased
compliance or unity with the creation of more [busy] bodies is preposterous. Allowing more people to
argue over this issue will simply drag it out.” He added that Chile must have ulterior motives, to propose
such a time-wasting plan for such a pressing problem – even Canada is tense over the topic of the Arctic.
ON AN ICE FLOE - 10:30 pm
In regards to the land disputed in the United Nations Security Council, the obvious
solution has been touched upon by Australia, whose subtlety was missed by the posturing of the other
countries. Australia suggested that the much sought-after Arctic be labelled as an environmental
sanctuary. This solution is the most cost-efficient thus far, as it essentially allows the land dispute to
melt away – quite literally. With global warming on the rise, the disputed land mass will simply melt into
the ocean, thus leaving the UNSC with one less topic to discuss.