Confirmation has been received, stating that the Iranian bloc of the Joint Crisis Committee (which has been debating issues associated with Israel’s involvement in The Iran Nuclear Deal) has successfully implemented a Sleeper Agent into The State of Israel’s JCC bloc. Sources in the Iranian JCC have confirmed that the identity of this double agent is the Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs. This agent has been activated in Israel, and sources confirm that Iran will begin to receive intel shortly. However, it is unclear how effective this agent will be due to the elevated level of division that exists throughout the Iranian JCC committee.
Members of the Iranian bloc discussed highly secretive tactics regarding how they might receive intelligence from Israel through the implementation of spies, and the Associated Press is reporting on all the inside details.
The Iranian bloc entered a heated questioning period in which they debated a directive to place agents in Iranian prisons, and letting them escape to Israel. The bloc seems to believe that Israel will willingly accept these prisoners into their borders, thinking that they will have useful intel on Iran. Upon countless flaws being pointed out in this directive (including that it “questions the ability of Iran” to maintain security in their prisons),, it was quickly amended to include sending direct operatives into Iran. However, due to the fluctuating nature of Iran’s strategies to acquire intel from within the Israeli borders, the Associated Press looks favorably upon Israel in this conflict.
The Iranian bloc seems disorganized, and unable to agree upon the aforementioned directive. Some members believe that sending undercover spies into Israel might be too drastic, and will be damaging to the already unstable relationship between Israel and Iran. These members believe that such a drastic plan will hinder the Iranian bloc’s main goal to gain power over Israel, without destroying them; and that the identities of the spies need to be protected in order to protect Iran as a whole. Members of the Iranian bloc questioned whether or not the Minister of Intelligence was considering the dire consequences of this “illogical” directive, if the agents are caught.
The Minister of Intelligence seemed to believe that the high threat level associated with The Iran Nuclear Deal calls for more information about Israel’s nuclear weaponry and connection with extremist terror groups such as ISIS. He went on to say that every country conducts espionage against one another, and therefore believed it would be “unusual” for Iran not to spy on Israel. He also stated that if the newly implemented spies were caught, it wouldn’t damage Iran’s reputation since the international community is already under the assumption that Iran has spies in Israel.
This committee was unable to reach any sort of consensus, and it seems unlikely that one will be reached anytime soon due to the segregated nature of the discourse. The Iranian Minister of religious Affairs called for strength on the part of Iran, stating “We have been on the defensive for far too long, we must go a bit on the offensive.” Nevertheless, for now it seems unclear as to whether or not Iran will be able to overcome their differences to take on a powerful, united nation such as Israel.
Members of the Iranian bloc discussed highly secretive tactics regarding how they might receive intelligence from Israel through the implementation of spies, and the Associated Press is reporting on all the inside details.
The Iranian bloc entered a heated questioning period in which they debated a directive to place agents in Iranian prisons, and letting them escape to Israel. The bloc seems to believe that Israel will willingly accept these prisoners into their borders, thinking that they will have useful intel on Iran. Upon countless flaws being pointed out in this directive (including that it “questions the ability of Iran” to maintain security in their prisons),, it was quickly amended to include sending direct operatives into Iran. However, due to the fluctuating nature of Iran’s strategies to acquire intel from within the Israeli borders, the Associated Press looks favorably upon Israel in this conflict.
The Iranian bloc seems disorganized, and unable to agree upon the aforementioned directive. Some members believe that sending undercover spies into Israel might be too drastic, and will be damaging to the already unstable relationship between Israel and Iran. These members believe that such a drastic plan will hinder the Iranian bloc’s main goal to gain power over Israel, without destroying them; and that the identities of the spies need to be protected in order to protect Iran as a whole. Members of the Iranian bloc questioned whether or not the Minister of Intelligence was considering the dire consequences of this “illogical” directive, if the agents are caught.
The Minister of Intelligence seemed to believe that the high threat level associated with The Iran Nuclear Deal calls for more information about Israel’s nuclear weaponry and connection with extremist terror groups such as ISIS. He went on to say that every country conducts espionage against one another, and therefore believed it would be “unusual” for Iran not to spy on Israel. He also stated that if the newly implemented spies were caught, it wouldn’t damage Iran’s reputation since the international community is already under the assumption that Iran has spies in Israel.
This committee was unable to reach any sort of consensus, and it seems unlikely that one will be reached anytime soon due to the segregated nature of the discourse. The Iranian Minister of religious Affairs called for strength on the part of Iran, stating “We have been on the defensive for far too long, we must go a bit on the offensive.” Nevertheless, for now it seems unclear as to whether or not Iran will be able to overcome their differences to take on a powerful, united nation such as Israel.