On April 1, 2017 the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) dynamically debated the drug war in Mexico. The debate began with an argument over the implementation of infrastructure. The delegate of the USA described a country “torn apart” by the violence of the drug war and the necessity of revitalizing the educating for youth to prevent the further growth of the drug cartels. The delegate of Egypt followed this by explaining the importance of improving the education system, which in turn would decrease the number of those working in the lucrative work force.
A passionate debate between the delegates of Venezuela and Angola occurred after Angola stated to Venezuela, “How can this committee act upon recommendation from a country like Venezuela, that has no money?” Venezuela countered this attack by explaining the horrific economic and political results of a drug war, and how Venezuela can empathize with Mexico’s struggles. Following this event,the delegate of Spain spun the debate around by trying to approach “the economic benefits” of a drug war. Many countries seemed appalled by the statement, however, the point did not stand as debate progressed.
A block between Venezuela, USA, and Russia formed and is preparing to present feasible solutions regarding infrastructure, education, transparency between international governments and the benefits to the Mexican community, international community and civilians. The opposing block consists of New Zealand, Angola, Uruguay, Senegal, and France. The proposed solutions by this block consist of decriminalization, legalization, and implementation of more drug reduction programs.
The key similarities between the two blocs are: the further improvement of education and infrastructure. It is clear that both blocs acknowledge the effectiveness of educating people on drugs and the ongoing war. However, the key difference creates a deep divide between the two blocs and prevents a unity between the two. The idea of legalization as stated by the delegates of New Zealand and the USA is the principal reason for the divide between the two blocs.
The delegate of the USA stated, “We see some merging possibilities however, their focal point is on legalization. If that is dropped, we will unite.” Overall, the possibility of the USA or Russia applying the power of veto to the opposition’s solutions is quite likely.” If the delegations were able to unite the probability of implementing feasible solutions would significantly increase.
A passionate debate between the delegates of Venezuela and Angola occurred after Angola stated to Venezuela, “How can this committee act upon recommendation from a country like Venezuela, that has no money?” Venezuela countered this attack by explaining the horrific economic and political results of a drug war, and how Venezuela can empathize with Mexico’s struggles. Following this event,the delegate of Spain spun the debate around by trying to approach “the economic benefits” of a drug war. Many countries seemed appalled by the statement, however, the point did not stand as debate progressed.
A block between Venezuela, USA, and Russia formed and is preparing to present feasible solutions regarding infrastructure, education, transparency between international governments and the benefits to the Mexican community, international community and civilians. The opposing block consists of New Zealand, Angola, Uruguay, Senegal, and France. The proposed solutions by this block consist of decriminalization, legalization, and implementation of more drug reduction programs.
The key similarities between the two blocs are: the further improvement of education and infrastructure. It is clear that both blocs acknowledge the effectiveness of educating people on drugs and the ongoing war. However, the key difference creates a deep divide between the two blocs and prevents a unity between the two. The idea of legalization as stated by the delegates of New Zealand and the USA is the principal reason for the divide between the two blocs.
The delegate of the USA stated, “We see some merging possibilities however, their focal point is on legalization. If that is dropped, we will unite.” Overall, the possibility of the USA or Russia applying the power of veto to the opposition’s solutions is quite likely.” If the delegations were able to unite the probability of implementing feasible solutions would significantly increase.