We have received news that this committee has finally driven out of their circular debate about funding sources and allocation. Since delegates have put the funding issue on the backburner, delegates have begun branching out to other issues such as education and preventative measures in order to reduce the spread of communicable disease within refugee camps.
Naturally, in the wake of this, differing ideas have flourished and blocs have formed. From what has been seen, there are two major blocs: the first consisting of Indonesia, Argentina, another unnamed country. The second is made up of Russia, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), and the United States of America (USA).
One would assume that both blocs would have differing ideas and produce fruitful debate to come to a solution that is best for the international community as a whole. However, according to a delegate who wishes to remain anonymous, “debate has been going in circles,”. According to this delegate, both blocs are essentially the same; both sides have similar ideas regarding education, vaccination, medical screenings within refugee camps, and funding allocation. As well, it seems that both sides have just been busy “...roasting each other…” in the words of our anonymous source.
It has been questioned as to why these two blocs do not just merge, but our anonymous source has said that “...they are too busy roasting each other to actually try to merge,”. This delegate has expressed hope that they are able to get back on topic, continue productive debate, and hopefully merge.
In other news, it seems that the delegate from Russia has attempted to look past its foreign policy and has offered to donate money to refugee camps. Other delegates have pointed out these contradictory actions and have “called out” the Russian representative.
Also, we have received news that Lebanon has advocated forced vaccinations within refugee camps as a “...quick and easy...” solution to the issue of disease within said camps.
Naturally, in the wake of this, differing ideas have flourished and blocs have formed. From what has been seen, there are two major blocs: the first consisting of Indonesia, Argentina, another unnamed country. The second is made up of Russia, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), and the United States of America (USA).
One would assume that both blocs would have differing ideas and produce fruitful debate to come to a solution that is best for the international community as a whole. However, according to a delegate who wishes to remain anonymous, “debate has been going in circles,”. According to this delegate, both blocs are essentially the same; both sides have similar ideas regarding education, vaccination, medical screenings within refugee camps, and funding allocation. As well, it seems that both sides have just been busy “...roasting each other…” in the words of our anonymous source.
It has been questioned as to why these two blocs do not just merge, but our anonymous source has said that “...they are too busy roasting each other to actually try to merge,”. This delegate has expressed hope that they are able to get back on topic, continue productive debate, and hopefully merge.
In other news, it seems that the delegate from Russia has attempted to look past its foreign policy and has offered to donate money to refugee camps. Other delegates have pointed out these contradictory actions and have “called out” the Russian representative.
Also, we have received news that Lebanon has advocated forced vaccinations within refugee camps as a “...quick and easy...” solution to the issue of disease within said camps.